Brands always interest me as I always see them as separate to each other, but in reality many companies own different brands. The ones that intrigue me are the brands that I think are completely unconnected.
Below is a list of companies and some of the brands they own:
- Mondelez: Oreo, Cadbury, Milka, Philadelphia, Dairylea, Ritz
- Unilever: Comfort, Dove, Flora, Hellmann's, Lynx, Magnum, Ben and Jerry's
- Mars: Pet food, Dolmio, Uncle Ben's, Starburst, Wrigley's Chewing Gum, Mars Bars, Snickers
- Nestle: Kitkat, Maggi, Pet food, Nescafe, Breakfast cereals, cereal bars
- Proctor and Gamble: Fairy, Head and Shoulders, Herbal Essences, Oral-B
I find it interesting that many consumers are unaware some of these brands are even connected, especially when you may consider them to be "competitors" of each other, for example I always thought Head and Shoulders and Herbal essences were competitors so change my shampoo occasionally to try out a new brand and it turns out they are technically the same company!
I also had no idea that Mars who produce Mars Bars, Snickers,Twix etc. also offer pet food and sell Uncle Ben's rice. In my opinion, these products aren't connected and this leads me to ask; Does it hinder a company if they have items in different product categories?
Surely, you can't be a strong market leader in all categories when you have a variety of different products ranging from chocolate to detergent? However it clearly is worth doing as many of the above companies have a wide portfolio range. I love anything like this that makes me wonder how things work as I am so curious about random things!
Providing little snippets of what is popular in the food industry including current trends, ingredients, great recipes and general chitchat about things I am passionate about!
Friday, 31 March 2017
Thursday, 23 March 2017
Chocolate without sugar?
Chocolate is an indulgent treat that many people enjoy on a more frequent basis than we would care to admit. It is creamy, rich and melts in the mouth and there are not many people who would decline a square or two if they were offered. I have just eaten a few squares of dark chocolate which is my latest guilty pleasure, trying to kid myself it is healthier as it is dark chocolate.
My favourite dark chocolate to date is Green and Blacks espresso dark chocolate, it has a real bitter sweet taste to it and is a real treat. It definitely motivates my to finish my dissertation which no surprise is all about chocolate!
I got thinking, could chocolate be made healthier by using sweeteners or another sugar alternative? If this was possible, would consumers be interested in trying this or do they want chocolate to contain sugar?
This is good food for thought - obviously natural sweeteners would have to be used but in general how much do consumers know about sweeteners and are they willing to eat products with multiple sweeteners or are consumers suspicious of the potential long term affects of them?
These are all questions I hope to find the answer to!
My favourite dark chocolate to date is Green and Blacks espresso dark chocolate, it has a real bitter sweet taste to it and is a real treat. It definitely motivates my to finish my dissertation which no surprise is all about chocolate!
I got thinking, could chocolate be made healthier by using sweeteners or another sugar alternative? If this was possible, would consumers be interested in trying this or do they want chocolate to contain sugar?
This is good food for thought - obviously natural sweeteners would have to be used but in general how much do consumers know about sweeteners and are they willing to eat products with multiple sweeteners or are consumers suspicious of the potential long term affects of them?
These are all questions I hope to find the answer to!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)